1. Panel moots
‘handling’ levy on cash payments
· Union
Budget 2017-18 should allow merchants as well as government departments to levy
a handling charge for cash payments above a certain limit, the Committee on Digital Payments has advised the finance ministry.
· It
also recommended a reduction in the mandatory threshold for quoting PAN card
numbers for cash transactions from Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 2,00,000, applicable in
different cases currently.
· The
committee, headed by former Finance Secretary Ratan P Watal, proposed that Aadhaar be used as an
alternate for KYC for people who don’t have a PAN. “Permit merchants,
including government agencies to levy a cash handling charge for payments in
cash above a certain threshold. The cash handling charge so collected should be
exclusively used to fund new infrastructure for acceptance of digital payments
(like PoS devices).”
PAN threshold:-
· Gradually,
the Centre should reduce the threshold for quoting of PAN, which is currently
mandated for banking transactions above Rs. 50,000 and merchant transactions of
more than RS. 2 lakh, the panel suggested.
· To
create parity between cash and digital payments, the panel proposed that eKYC
requirements in digital payments should be in consonance with KYC norms for
transacting in cash. “Transactions which are permitted in cash without KYC
should also be permitted on prepaid wallets without KYC,” .
· The
committee’s report, on which public comments and suggestions have been invited
over the next fortnight, has also pitched for allowing tax payments by debit
cards and e-wallets, against the current option of net banking only. “CBDT and
CBEC should develop an e-commerce based model where their web portals generate
the tax challans and accept payments from all electronic modes.”
· A
recommendation has also been made to make Aadhaar numbers compulsory in Income
Tax returns, although the committee has stressed such an amendment must only be
made after seeking the Attorney General’s opinion. Income tax payers already
have PAN cards.
· It
further said that CBEC should issue necessary instructions to facilitate
Service Tax input credit on price of digital transactions. Amendments have also
been mooted to the General Financial Rules, 2005 and Central Government Account
(Receipt and Payment) Rules, 1983, to include digital modes of payment.
· The
panel also recommended that when government acts as a merchant, it should bear
the cost of electronic payments and not pass them on to consumers.
· Digital
payments for low value transactions, such as parking charges, toll charges or
health services at government hospitals and health centres, also need to be
promoted. “The low value routine transactions need special attention. These are
payments that touch the lives of people every day.”
· Pushing
for adoption of digital payments for all government transactions, it has also
proposed that utility bills and payments to government above a certain
threshold be made only in digital mode. Also, convenience or service charge
levied by utility service providers, petrol pumps, railways, airlines on
electronic payments should be withdrawn.
· Customs
and excise duties on import of equipment which form a part of retail payment
system infrastructure must be cut in the Budget, it recommended. The list
includes micro ATMs used by business correspondents; fingerprint readers and
biometric readers either as spare parts or as integrated electronic data
capture machines and point- of-sale (PoS) terminals.
Cash heavy
economy:-
· India
is a cash heavy economy, with almost 78 per cent of all consumer payments being
effected in cash. This imposes an estimated cost of Rs. 21,000 crore, without
factoring in other effects of cash reliance, such as counterfeit currency and
black money.
· Transitioning
to digital payments was estimated to bring about a significant reduction in
costs incurred on account of inefficiencies associated with cash and other
paper based payments.
· “For
instance, by certain estimates, transitioning to an electronic platform for
government payments itself could save approximately Rs. 100,000 crore annually,
with the cost of the transition being estimated at Rs. 60,000 to Rs. 70,000
crore.”
2.Status of
tribal development remains poor: Ministry report
· The tribal
population in India lags behind other social groups on various
social parameters, such as child mortality, infant mortality, number of anaemic
women, says the latest annual report of the Ministry of Tribal Affairs.
· Tribal
population, with a vast majority engaged in agricultural labour, has a higher
incidence of anaemia in women when compared to other social groups.
· The
community also registered the highest
child mortality and infant mortality rates, when compared to other social
groups, the data indicates.
· While
educational achievements on the whole has improved, statistics cited elsewhere
in the Report shows that the gross enrolment ratio among tribal students in the
primary school level has declined from 113.2 in 2013-14 to 109.4 in 2015-16.
Besides, the dropout rate among tribal students has been at an alarming level.
· While
the overall poverty rates among the tribal population have fallen compared to
previous years, they remain relatively poorer when weighed against other social
groups.
·
Health
infrastructure has also been found wanting in tribal areas.
Gaps in
rehabilitation:-
· Further,
it exposes the gap in rehabilitation of tribal community members displaced by
various development projects. Out of an estimated 85 lakh persons displaced due
to development projects and natural calamities, only 21 lakh were shown to have
been rehabilitated so far.
· “Rehabilitation
only happens on paper, and any compensation for displaced adivasi folks is
siphoned off by others in their name,”.
· In
2014, the Central government initiated the VanbandhuKalyanYojana for the
holistic development and welfare of tribal population on a pilot basis.
However, the Annual Report points out that the token budgetary provisions being
made under the scheme to the tune of Rs.100.00 crore and Rs.200.00 crore for
2014-15 and 2015-16, respectively, is minuscule and barely sufficient to meet
the purpose of the Scheme given that it intends to cover 27 States across the
country.
·
The
Ministry has emphasised that more funds be provided for the Scheme from the
year 2016-17 onwards.
3.Nepal rejects
India’s ‘open sky’ offer
·
Nepal
has rejected India’s ‘open sky’ offer to allow unlimited flights between the
two countries at a meeting held here on December 20.
· Nepal
said it was not yet ready for the agreement. India has been keen on countering
Nepal’s recent engagement with China on the road, railways and port
connectivity. “Nepal said it was not yet ready for the ‘open-sky’ agreement and
it might consider the proposal two years later,” said a senior official of the
Ministry. Airlines from India and Nepal are now allowed to operate 30,000 seats
from each side.
· India
and Nepal signed a memorandum of understanding to set up a joint technical
committee to examine Nepal’s request for developing new air routes and air
entry points at Janakpur, Bhairahawa and Nepalgunj. “The committee will meet in
the first week of February to examine the feasibility of the proposed routes,”.
· The
latest development comes days after India signed an agreement with Sri Lanka,
Jamaica, Guyana, Czech Republic, Finland and Spain to allow airlines to operate
unlimited flights to Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Hyderabad and Bengaluru.
· Nepal
has long been pushing for new airspaces to ease congestion on the existing
routes and to save time and cost for air passengers.
· “Nepal
is building a major international airport at Bhairwaha, near the Uttar Pradesh
border, and the airport at Pokhara will soon be brought to international
standards.
· The
issue of increased air service and additional routes was part of the joint
statement issued during the visit of Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal
‘Prachanda.’ In it, Prime Minister NarendraModi had said India’s initiatives
for ‘open sky’ and cross-border connectivity “would directly benefit Nepal and
help strengthen our economic partnership.”
· Under
the National Civil Aviation Policy, approved by the Union Cabinet earlier this
year, India intends to enter into ‘open-sky’ agreements with SAARC countries and
with those beyond the 5,000-km radius from Delhi.
· Countries
sign air services agreements (ASAs) through bilateral negotiations to decide
the number of flights airlines can fly. Under the ‘open-sky’ agreement, there
is no restriction on flights or seats.
Among SAARC
countries:-
· India
doesn’t have any ‘open sky’ agreement with Pakistan, Nepal and Afghanistan. It
allows unlimited flights from Bangladesh and Maldives at 18 domestic airports,
from Sri Lanka at 23 airports, and from Bhutan at all its airports.
Air transport
agreement:-
· A
air transport agreement (also sometimes called an air service agreement or ATA
or ASA) is an agreement which two nations sign to allow international
commercial air transport services between their territories.
· The
bilateral system has its basis under the Chicago convention and associated
multilateral treaties.
· The
Chicago Convention was signed in December 1944 and has governed international
air services since then. the convention also has a range of annexes covering
issues such as aviation security, safety oversight, air worthiness, navigation,
environmental protection and facilitation (expediting and departure at
airports).